Over the weekend the start of what will be thousands of leaked diplomatic cables started appearing on the web.
Quite a few governments didn't want the contents to become public, prime among them the US, so it was perhaps of little surprise that the site hosting the information Wikileaks was hit buy a distributed denial of service (DDOS) web attack.
A DDOS attack is designed to paralyze a web site and effectively take it off air and the reasons for someone wanting to do that in this case are clear.
However the attacks failed and the leaks, which will last for the next few days, continue to come. Ironically one of the leaks covers the Chinese attack on Google at the start of the year. In that case, apparently orchestrated when a Politburo member found unflattering things about himself on the web, it was successful and the search giant moved out of the country.
So in a strange way not only do these leaked diplomatic cables do the US and its allies great harm but in terms of demonstrating the effectiveness of hackers to take down the site those trying to do so clearly have a lot to learn from the Chinese.
It's interesting perhaps that it takes students, who at the moment are facing hikes in their fees, to show their anger on the streets.
Businesses hit by tough times, the prospect of VAT cuts and thousands of public sector workers potentially losing their jobs have maybe produced some outraged letters to the papers but no burning placards on the streets.
The students focused on Millbank Tower where there are not just Conservative party offices but plenty of PR agencies as well. Just the other week Oracle held a partner event in the tower. Imagine that potential diary clash.
But as one of the PRs looking down on the mob commented "I guess you are more active at that age." Perhaps that is why it's students not business people out on the streets.
One of the best things that could happen for Apple is the widespread adoption of the Bring Your Own Computer movement which is starting to have a real impact across customers.
One example given to me this week will stick in the mind for a long time. Talking to a vendor with a background in virtualisation my contact revealed that it had provided staff with the option to buy their own technology out of the corporate purse.
The result was that 40% chose an Apple device indicating that not far off half the company were not happy with the Windows and desktop PC environment that they had been working in for so long.
When asked what that spending on Apple actually meant it was a range of products including the iPad. Those with the tablet really are the best adverts for Apple being so enthusiastic about the product getting it out and showing it off.
The result is that for the first time for most staff there might be an opportunity soon to buy technology that not only works but looks good and is something they are happy to carry around.
That is all good news for Apple and perhaps its the unforeseen consequences of the bring your own attitude that will help the Mac vendor get its feet back into the corporate sector in a way it hasn't enjoyed for a long time.
If you want to distract one of your arch rivals from keeping their eye on the ball there is nothing like a court case to help do that.
So it came as little surprise to see that Oracle is looking to get former SAP CEO and the latest boss of HP Leo Apotheker embroiled in the court case that has been running for a fair old while between the two software vendors.
In a brief nutshell the arguments started after a division of SAP downloaded and used Oracle's code around three years ago. If memory serves me right there was an admission that wrong doing had indeed been done but this was as a result of a mistake and procedures and policy had been changed to ensure it never happened again.
But three years later and the legal wheels have turned to the point where a court date is now close and the chance to get Apotheker embroiled in the business in his previous role as SAP CEO.
Of course in many ways it is going to be very much like the moment the former BP chief Tony Hayward had to face US politicians about the oil spill in New Mexico. He argued, quite rightly, that as CEO he would not have visibility of the decisions and actions that led to that problem.
The same is probably going to be true of Apotheker who will point out that SAP is a pretty large outfit and he could not know what every individual programmer was up to. He was also trying to get the firm through a tough recession as well so his mind might well have been on other problems.
But of course in his current role as CEO of HP that is not really the point and just bogging down his diary and his mental energy in this case is something that presumably will bring a smile to the faces of those executives at Oracle working so hard to compete against Leo's current company.