Proceeds of crime? Not.

What should employers do with staff on remand pending criminal proceedings? The employee can't work - should they be paid? Well in the case of Burns v Santander UK plc, the Employment Appeals Tribunal said that the lower Tribunal was right to throw out a claim by Burns for 'unlawful deduction of

What should employers do with staff on remand pending criminal proceedings? The employee can't work - should they be paid? 

Well in the case of Burns v Santander UK plc, the Employment Appeals Tribunal said that the lower Tribunal was right to throw out a claim by Burns for 'unlawful deduction of wages'.

Apparently Burns had been arrested and charged with some 13 offences including assault on a prostitute. He was held for six months while he awaited trial during which time he wasn't paid. He was subsequently only convicted of common assault and a assault with intent to commit a sexual assault. The sentence was non-custodial.

Burns used the argument that he should be paid whilst being held because - in theory at least - he was ready and willing to work to his contract and it was the unavoidable incarceration that prevented his working. However the EAT said that the remand was a result of his voluntary actions and therefore he shouldn't be paid.
This was first published in August 2011

MicroScope+

Content

Find more MicroScope+ content and other member only offers, here.

Read more on Salesforce Management

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

ComputerWeekly

SearchITChannel

Close