Proceeds of crime? Not.


Proceeds of crime? Not.

What should employers do with staff on remand pending criminal proceedings? The employee can't work - should they be paid? 

Well in the case of Burns v Santander UK plc, the Employment Appeals Tribunal said that the lower Tribunal was right to throw out a claim by Burns for 'unlawful deduction of wages'.

Apparently Burns had been arrested and charged with some 13 offences including assault on a prostitute. He was held for six months while he awaited trial during which time he wasn't paid. He was subsequently only convicted of common assault and a assault with intent to commit a sexual assault. The sentence was non-custodial.

Burns used the argument that he should be paid whilst being held because - in theory at least - he was ready and willing to work to his contract and it was the unavoidable incarceration that prevented his working. However the EAT said that the remand was a result of his voluntary actions and therefore he shouldn't be paid.

This was first published in August 2011

Join the conversation Comment



    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.